Rethinking Chernobyl
From Big Picture Science | Part of the Big Picture Science series | 54:00
The catastrophic explosion at Chernobyl triggered a full-scale destruction of the reactor in the worst nuclear reactor accident in history. But researchers with access to once-classified Soviet documents now say the accident was worse than we thought and, given the culture then-prevalent in the Soviet Union, was nearly inevitable. Others say that the death toll from the mishap may be greatly underestimated. But with nuclear energy representing a possible solution to rising carbon dioxide emissions, how do we evaluate risk under the long shadow of Chernobyl?
- Playing
- Rethinking Chernobyl
- From
- Big Picture Science
The catastrophic explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in April 1986 triggered the full-scale destruction of the reactor. But now researchers with access to once-classified Soviet documents are challenging the official version of what happened both before and after the explosion. They say that the accident was worse than we thought and that a number of factors – from paranoia to poor engineering – made the mishap inevitable. Others claim a much larger death toll from extended exposure to low levels of radiation. But with nuclear energy being a possibly essential component of dealing with rising carbon dioxide emissions, how do we evaluate risk under the long shadow of Chernobyl?
Guests:
- Adam Higginbotham – Author of “Midnight in Chernobyl: The Untold Story of the World’s Greatest Nuclear Disaster”
- Kate Brown – Historian of Environmental and Nuclear History at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and author of “Manual for Survival: A Chernobyl Guide for the Future”
- James Smith – Professor in the School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, U.K. He was interviewed for and has written a review of "Manual for Survival"
- Ted Nordhaus – Founder and Executive Director of The Breakthrough Institute, Berkeley, California