Comments for A Short History of Music as a Weapon

Caption: PRX default Piece image

Produced by Aaron Henkin

Other pieces by Aaron Henkin

Summary: From Scottish bagpipes to Metallica, this radio essay takes listeners on a short tour through the history of music as a weapon.
 

User image

Review of A Short History of Music as a Weapon

A very nice piece by one of my favorite PRX producers. Well produced, written and voiced.
As a news guy, I'm always looking for a "peg" - so we're airing this story this week to coincide with the report in Time that detainees were awakened by the music of Christina Aguilera.
Better than Jessica Simpson, I suppose....

User image

Review of A Short History of Music as a Weapon

It is amazing what human beings do to one another. This short piece is chock full of information that shows that while music might have charms to soothe the savage breast, it can also be used to scare, humiliate and destroy human beings. A sound-rich piece, the listener will learn that, two centuries ago, the British banned the bagpipe and declared it a weapon of war. Now the bagpipe is used as a heartwrenching instrument during funeral marches. (Is any instrument more plaintive? Maybe the harmonica.)A variety of other musical artists,instruments, and sounds are featured as weapons of torture. It would be the sound of a dental drill that would finally break me. This piece would fit in whenever there was any news from Iraq. The piece could also stand alone. Five minutes well worth a listen, it would grab me wherever I was and whatever I was doing. I would turn to my friend and say, "Shhh . . . listen to this."


Review of A Short History of Music as a Weapon

This is audio narrative at its finest and worth 5 minutes of your time.

User image

Review of A Short History of Music as a Weapon

In reading the previous review, I'm reminded of just how subjective listening can be. While finding a way to appropriately credit the source of the ideas here is important, this piece struck me on the whole as an unusual and thought-provoking talk+music essay, in the upper tier of what's available on PRX.

Henkin's strategy of unexpectadly stepping back in time to Waco at the end was, to my ears, an effective and powerful narrative choice. It allows the piece to end on a note that engages listeners pretty directly in the psyops experience, and I think will cause them to reflect on what they've heard in more depth (and with less ideological polarization) than if the piece ended with the more straight-forward scenes from Iraq.

Hadn't remembered the details of how crickets and Nancy Sinatra were used at Waco, and Henkin's dramatization, adding sound on top of sound, felt quite effective. This is an audio essay, not a news report, so I wasn't greatly bothered by the use of sound effects — though it would be simple for the producer to tweak the narration to make it clear that we're not listening to actual sound from Waco, by saying that it sounded "something like this."

Presented as an essay or commentary, and perhaps followed by a phoner interview with Kerr Houston as Henkin suggests, this could work nicely on a station-produced magazine show.

Caption: PRX default User image

Review of A Short History of Music as a Weapon

Your piece would have had a lot more impact if you had included any real nat pops from any of the actual events you described (except the bag pipes of course)rather than sound effects. It is far more powerful to the listener when you let them hear how it really sounds. I also think it would have been far more interesting to let the scholar Kerr Houston you mentioned do the talking since this sounds like it was based on his original research. Is there a reason why you didn't proceed chronologically rather than jumping back and forth? The topic is interesting but you could make it much better radio piece with more actualities and experts and voices other than your own. Maybe make it shorter too!Keep up the good work!