This sound montage lets people in their early 20s tell listeners about life after college. It's definitely intriguing and outside the usual public radio sound. It needs a bit of touching up to make it air friendly, but it's worth putting into a showcase slot and would probably do best on a weeknight evening or on a weekend afternoon or evening.
The sound montage definitely grabs the ear and the use of sound is just as important as what the students are saying. We've all heard and experienced life in our early 20s, so this piece let's us hear the views of the young people in an artful way. It's also interesting to hear what phrases and words are mixed and repeated.
It's good that this type of radio is produced. It helps explore new ways of storytelling outside the usual framework. Nice job Carlin.
An interesting idea built upon some good tape, but exhausting to the ear from very early on. Hard to tell why the rush to conclusion in this mix -- multitracking effects here do not necessarily clarify the proverbial meaning of the message. Editorially speaking, I'd love to hear from the start who these people are and why we're hearing their stories.
This is a piece composed of complex layers of sound ? bits of interviews manipulated into rhythms that makes the human voices take on the semblance of percussion instruments. There?s much to admire in the composer/producer?s skill and effort spent into the making of this feature.
However much I love artistic skill in radio though, I?m dubious about whether form should be secondary to content. So much effort and fiddling around has gone into making this an artistic audio work that it makes it ? for me at least - just a bit too self conscious.
Listening to the piece, I was forced to re-examine my ideas on what radio is for. The discussions here by a group of 20 somethings about where their lives are going, in the end were the ramblings of not quite adults searching for meaning. Fine ? but is this of real interest to a radio audience? Do we learn anything about this group of people in particular, young people in general? Not sure.
Does this piece have a right to be played? Yes it does ? it can rightfully be called audio art. Is it a documentary, suitable for the radio ? I have a feeling that its not. There are few radio slots left for this kind of audio work. One would have to listen to it on stirling quality FM for it not to turn into sound mush. The ABC?s Listening Room was such a forum for audio afficianados in Australia for decades before it was recently axed. If you have a radio slot that wants to feature experimental sound then by all means play this piece. If however you?re looking for a documentary on say, the Confusion of Modern Youth ? you should perhaps look around a bit more.
Comments for After 23: Conversations on Direction
Produced by Carlin Corrigan
Other pieces by Carlin Corrigan
Rating Summary
3 comments
Arvid Hokanson
Posted on June 26, 2006 at 12:59 PM | Permalink
Review of After 23: Conversations on Direction
This sound montage lets people in their early 20s tell listeners about life after college. It's definitely intriguing and outside the usual public radio sound. It needs a bit of touching up to make it air friendly, but it's worth putting into a showcase slot and would probably do best on a weeknight evening or on a weekend afternoon or evening.
The sound montage definitely grabs the ear and the use of sound is just as important as what the students are saying. We've all heard and experienced life in our early 20s, so this piece let's us hear the views of the young people in an artful way. It's also interesting to hear what phrases and words are mixed and repeated.
It's good that this type of radio is produced. It helps explore new ways of storytelling outside the usual framework. Nice job Carlin.
Jackson Braider
Posted on June 24, 2006 at 07:30 PM | Permalink
Review of After 23: Conversations on Direction
An interesting idea built upon some good tape, but exhausting to the ear from very early on. Hard to tell why the rush to conclusion in this mix -- multitracking effects here do not necessarily clarify the proverbial meaning of the message. Editorially speaking, I'd love to hear from the start who these people are and why we're hearing their stories.
Dheera Sujan
Posted on June 23, 2006 at 04:25 AM | Permalink
Review of After 23: Conversations on Direction
This is a piece composed of complex layers of sound ? bits of interviews manipulated into rhythms that makes the human voices take on the semblance of percussion instruments. There?s much to admire in the composer/producer?s skill and effort spent into the making of this feature.
However much I love artistic skill in radio though, I?m dubious about whether form should be secondary to content. So much effort and fiddling around has gone into making this an artistic audio work that it makes it ? for me at least - just a bit too self conscious.
Listening to the piece, I was forced to re-examine my ideas on what radio is for. The discussions here by a group of 20 somethings about where their lives are going, in the end were the ramblings of not quite adults searching for meaning. Fine ? but is this of real interest to a radio audience? Do we learn anything about this group of people in particular, young people in general? Not sure.
Does this piece have a right to be played? Yes it does ? it can rightfully be called audio art. Is it a documentary, suitable for the radio ? I have a feeling that its not. There are few radio slots left for this kind of audio work. One would have to listen to it on stirling quality FM for it not to turn into sound mush. The ABC?s Listening Room was such a forum for audio afficianados in Australia for decades before it was recently axed. If you have a radio slot that wants to feature experimental sound then by all means play this piece. If however you?re looking for a documentary on say, the Confusion of Modern Youth ? you should perhaps look around a bit more.